From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 22 11:11:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA15053
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 1996 11:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sierra.zyzzyva.com (ppp0.zyzzyva.com [198.183.2.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA15036
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 May 1996 11:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zyzzyva.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sierra.zyzzyva.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA03001 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 May 1996 13:11:06 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-Message-Id: <199605221811.NAA03001@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
Message-Id: <199605221811.NAA03001@sierra.zyzzyva.com>
To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis)
Subject: Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP 
In-reply-to: dennis's message of Wed, 22 May 1996 10:49:27 -0400.
         <199605221449.KAA26388@etinc.com> 
X-uri: http://www.zyzzyva.com/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:03:19 -0500
From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Resent-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:11:05 -0500
Resent-From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Can anyone, in a nutshell please, give me a simple bullet list of the
> most compelling reasons (excluding obscure device support) to
> run the SNAP over 2.1R.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Dennis

One of the more interesting things about the -current source tree
is the DEVFS. I don't have a feel for how stable it is in the latest
SNAP, but something I am looking forward to using. Perhaps someone
can comment on it's usefullness/stability?