Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:38:35 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Dmitry Morozovsky" <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.26 available for FreeBSD Message-ID: <op.usk9q9f49aq2h7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904181912210.56580@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <1239343955.4933.113.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1239667718.1304.66.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140427160.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239669463.1304.67.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140439310.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239670126.1304.75.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140451240.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904140504380.2317@woozle.rinet.ru> <3f1fd1ea0904131951u5e6b211dlbb55af484d91e63b@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904141419060.62790@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239717249.1407.9.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142104300.11410@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239730007.1304.237.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142219331.11410@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239736472.1304.251.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904142322000.21559@woozle.rinet.ru> <1239737820.1304.265.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904181327040.56580@woozle.rinet.ru> <op.usk67dvo9aq2h7@localhost> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904181912210.56580@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:15:59 -0500, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote: > On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > JM> > JMC> > JMC> > Another question: is there a way to avoid apache22 > install > JM> > (i have apache13 > JM> > JMC> > JMC> > installed and have no current plans to upgrade) ? I > tried to > JM> > chase > JM> > JMC> > JMC> > options but failed. > JM> > JMC> > JMC> > JM> > JMC> > JMC> Not by using the meta-port. This is required for > JM> > gnome-user-share which > JM> > JMC> > JMC> is now part of the GNOME Desktop. > JM> > JMC> > > JM> > JMC> > Hmm, so currently there is no way to install gnome2 without > JM> > requiring apache22? > JM> > JMC> > JM> > JMC> Correct. You could, of course, go through the meta-port, and > remove > JM> > JMC> gnome-user-share on your own (i.e. build your own customized > JM> > meta-port). > JM> > > JM> > Well, would you object to the following quick fix? > JM> > JM> Wel.. I object. marcus also said that you only can do in your own > system, so > JM> it means we don't want to add any option in x11/gnome2. We always > turn down > JM> that kind of patch unless no choice for limit size to build packages > in CD > JM> for the release. > > I hope I understand your intentions, but this is not the first options > for the > metaport, heh? ;-) > > My main concern is that many my colleagues work on desktop systems which > they > are using as sorta "personal websevers" too, not too resource hungry, > hence > apache 1.3. From the last upgrade the only way to achieve it on a single > machine is to split Gnome and apache to separate jails... I didn't exactly read previous thread, but you do have a good point. I am surpised about that gnome-user-share doesn't use gvfs. Isn't gvfs supposed to be already support WebDAV (gvfs-dav)? Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.usk9q9f49aq2h7>