Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:56:08 +0100 From: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> To: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg crashes with signal 11 on startup Message-ID: <4B28E6F8.1060704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1260970270.26065.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net> References: <e890cae60912151253r2afc34dq3c2814f63360fc94@mail.gmail.com> <e890cae60912151254n15b90b10oce65e556ca6d0dc0@mail.gmail.com> <20091215161419.14c36e9b@sorrow.ashke.com> <e890cae60912151317k3811e37auf3a10ac2d61e68b4@mail.gmail.com> <20091215162721.6c5c55df@sorrow.ashke.com> <e890cae60912151337g1f1da0d5v710e172c49ba568b@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912151610040.31318@wonkity.com> <4B281CCC.6050204@gmail.com> <1260970270.26065.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16-12-2009 14:31, Robert Noland wrote: > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:33 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote: >> (==) RADEON(0): Using XAA acceleration architecture > > First, set Option AccelMethod "EXA" > > XAA is horribly bit-rotten and likely will never work again. > I'm currently using the default AccelMethod, but I've added EXA explicitly. > The other thing that seems very peculiar is this... > > (II) RADEON(0): Detected total video RAM=131072K, accessible=262144K > (PCI BAR=262144K) > > Do you know how much ram is actually on the card? This may not be > effecting anything, but I've never noticed a card that reported a BAR > being larger than the actual amount of ram on the card. > According to http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-X1450.2548.0.html it is 256 MB, which conforms to what I remember. The "official" page at http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1450/specs.html doesn't mention any RAM size. Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B28E6F8.1060704>