From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 09:15:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F53106564A for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars.engels@0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AA28FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316E16A6FD6 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:15:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgL-zslvazPx for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:15:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 0x20.net (0x20.net [217.69.76.212]) (Authenticated sender: lala) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E88E36A6C48 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:14:59 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:14:59 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: In-Reply-To: <20110927090655.4BBC3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20110927090655.4BBC3106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <01f0b4413a0b18e65d802bb11f3dc0b9@mail.0x20.net> X-Sender: lars.engels@0x20.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.4 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 or 3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:15:01 -0000 On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:06:53 +0000 (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote: > I see a thread, "FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems." and now am > curious about what is the current beta? > > I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ > > and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and > amd64. > > Maybe the burncd problem, not working on SATA, is a temporary > barrier? > > Not to sound impatient, I'd rather wait for something good than > something released prematurely. BETA3 is uploaded to all mirrors ATM, so expect an announcement about its availability, soon.