From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Sep 27 02:07:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA23029
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 02:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.muc.ditec.de (gw.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA22970;
          Fri, 27 Sep 1996 02:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nobody@localhost) by gw.muc.ditec.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id LAA18741; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:07:04 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: gw.muc.ditec.de: nobody set sender to <me@tick.muc.ditec.de> using -f
Received: from tick.muc.ditec.de(134.98.18.50) by gw.muc.ditec.de via smap (V2.0alpha)
	id sma018734; Fri Sep 27 11:06:53 1996
Received: (from me@localhost) by tick.muc.ditec.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id LAA12831; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:05:45 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Michael Elbel <me@tick.muc.ditec.de>
Message-Id: <199609270905.LAA12831@tick.muc.ditec.de>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Acrobat Reader 3.0 Beta for Linux! (fwd)]
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:05:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: phk@critter.tfs.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, chuckr@glue.umd.edu,
        julian@whistle.com, current@FreeBSD.org, me@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <756.843812682@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Sep 27, 96 01:24:42 am"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > In message <18101.843799721@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
> > >> I like it; RC4 in postscript.  There are some _sick_ people out there 8)
> > >
> > >You've clearly never seen the turing machine written in vi. :-)
> > >[and I didn't even know you could DO that with vi!]
> > 
> > Uhm, where do you feed the paper tape in ?
> 
> >From a file, of course.  It reads the paper tape file and executes it,
> using vi's `execute macro from buffer' feature to permute the
> instruction chain.  I remember giving Michael Elbel a copy - you
> still got it, Michael?
> 

Uh, I can't seem to find it on the machines I've got here. If there's
real interest, I could try to dig it up though.

Michael