From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 7 8:18:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nimitz.ca.sandia.gov (nimitz.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.243.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED4F37BBDF for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:18:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@nimitz.ca.sandia.gov) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by nimitz.ca.sandia.gov (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) id e27GIIx02901; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:18:18 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003071618.e27GIIx02901@nimitz.ca.sandia.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1-cvs 10/15/1999 To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: bmah@california.sandia.gov, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 and rc.conf questions In-Reply-To: <20000307114406M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> References: <20000306201859K.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <200003061550.e26FoLS20060@nimitz.ca.sandia.gov> <20000307102338G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000307114406M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Comments: In-reply-to Yoshinobu Inoue message dated "Tue, 07 Mar 2000 11:44:06 +0900." From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1327064270P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 08:18:18 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-1327064270P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: > And now I think the problem is that entry name, > rtadvd_enable="NO" > is not intuitive for users. > > So how about changing the name to something like, > > ipv6_to_be_defaultrouter="NO" > > and if it is set to YES, then rc.network6 invoke rtadvd (and > possibly do other works)? > > Please give me comments if it seems reasonable or not, and > also if the name is good or bad. I think that I know just enough about IPv6 to be dangerous, at this point. With that in mind, I think we should keep the name (because that describes exactly what it does), and just change the default to "YES". Cheers, Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1327064270P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: E+vKXS2gF73YZKGANY6eY8aRbERGswik iQA/AwUBOMUrytjKMXFboFLDEQLo3gCgtoyAM0s7MrhtejRBnh5lssbJ4J8AoJgs WpYOM48Fl4kd7/+HJePLTzbP =kb4I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1327064270P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message