Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:56:03 +1100 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: gallatin@cs.duke.edu (Andrew Gallatin) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: depending on libbfd Message-ID: <199901140156.MAA12900@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <13981.17873.789684.661748@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> from Andrew Gallatin at "Jan 13, 1999 8:31:20 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > What's the proper FreeBSD way to handle something like this? > Do I just download a binutils distribution & build it from within the > port? > > Given that binutils is already in the source tree, it seems a little > odd that the bfd libraries & headers are never installed.. We probably should build shared versions and install them. Many of the binutils programs could be linked shared too. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901140156.MAA12900>