Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:54:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267751] lang/gcc*: Address sanitizer isn't properly enabled: ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list Message-ID: <bug-267751-29464-11San9J9PV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-267751-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-267751-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267751 Lorenzo Salvadore <salvadore@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dim@FreeBSD.org, | |emaste@freebsd.org --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Salvadore <salvadore@freebsd.org> --- Please note that the patch for gcc13-devel is slightly different than the o= nes for gcc11-devel and gcc12-devel. The patch for gcc13-devel is the one that should be sent to upstream, assuming everything is fine. Also please note that the same bug might affect clang in the src repository too: indeed the same file I am patching here is present in contrib/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_linux.cpp. dim@, emaste@: I see you have worked on sanitizers in the src repository. Should I submit my patch there too? Or do you think it is better that I sub= mit it directly to LLVM and then FreeBSD will merge it when it imports a new version of LLVM? Do you have any improvement to suggest on the patch itself? By the way, I have tried adding https://github.com/emaste/freebsd/commit/930a7c2ac67e1e8e511aa1d0a31a16c632= 060ebb into my patch, but it did not work. If I recall correctly, I have got an er= ror 2 from execve or execvpe. I have not insisted testing it because I was unsu= re that it was really useful for the GCC ports, but I can test it again if you want. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-267751-29464-11San9J9PV>