From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 11 20:52:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A21716A4E6; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:52:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1568C43D58; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6BKpptv000477; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:51:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3P/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k6BKptkk059706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:51:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060711164431.04bd00f8@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:52:11 -0400 To: Ruslan Ermilov From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20060711203417.GJ56190@ip.net.ua> References: <44B4010E.7010809@mac.com> <77121.1152648353@critter.freebsd.dk> <6.2.3.4.0.20060711161049.04bd37a0@64.7.153.2> <20060711203417.GJ56190@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on clamscanner3 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: Integrity checking NANOBSD images X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:52:33 -0000 At 04:34 PM 11/07/2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > With respect to prepending a random salt to the image, can you expand > > what you mean ? > > >It means that every time you want to checksum it, you send some >random bits to be prepended to the image, then compute the >checksum(s). You then do the same (with the same salt) on a >trusted host and compare the results. OK, but that implies I have a copy of the image locally. We do on occasion make modifications to the config in the field, and sending back a 512MB image over dialup would be difficult for this deployment. ---Mike