Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 02:24:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Cc: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r501984 - in head/misc: . hashdb Message-ID: <20190520022450.GA88143@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7E1CE458-54C5-4C25-A5D6-228A44BE8E2F@cschubert.com> References: <201905182147.x4ILlUQA070885@repo.freebsd.org> <7E1CE458-54C5-4C25-A5D6-228A44BE8E2F@cschubert.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 07:06:24AM -0400, Cy Schubert wrote: > >Date: Sat May 18 21:47:30 2019 > >New Revision: 501984 > >URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/501984 > > > >Log: > > Remove hashdb, depending directly on the openssl port is forbidden > > > > With hat: portmgr > > > >Deleted: > > head/misc/hashdb/ > >Modified: > > head/misc/Makefile > > The auto-remove policy should include any new port that depends on old > insecure openssl unless explicitly approved by ports security team. There shouldn't be auto-remove policy, at least not the way it looks right now. We had traditionally allowed for mistakes to be fixed by the port author/committer, instead of removing ports within hours without providing any failure log or giving sufficient time to come up with a fix. What Antoine is doing is counter-productive and just plain rude. :-( ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190520022450.GA88143>