From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 18 2:18:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8C937B405; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g3I9IBjC047037; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200204180918.g3I9IBjC047037@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5) In-Reply-To: <200204180802.g3I82Fof000721@Magelan.Leidinger.net> To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Cc: DougB@FreeBSD.ORG, ache@nagual.pp.ru, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On 18 Apr, Doug Barton wrote: > > Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in > > -stable to the last known-good state? > > We have some time until the code freeze, so give him some days to track > it down. If he is able to fix it: fine, else he can still back it out. I'll see what I can do, but my time is VERY limitted for the next 2-3 weeks, if I get any spare time at all... However, if its decided to back out whats in -stable, remember that it will bring ATA support back to what was in 4.5, which will severely reduce our chipset support etc, which is alot worse IMNHO. The right solution would be to just disable tagged queing, and state that in the docs, but I'm not the RE@ :) -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message