Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:09:26 +0000
From:      Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
To:        Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: What is user uucp good for?
Message-ID:  <20021105220926.GB6129@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <20021105205749.GA70604@barbera.system.pl>
References:  <20021102054139.GE39842@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20021103032757.GA14982@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021105205749.GA70604@barbera.system.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org) napisa?(a):
> > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:11:39PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > A number of base system utilities and ports still use it for access to
> > the serial port devices (which are owned by the uucp user).  Really,
> > the uucp user is now misnamed and should be called something like
> 
> Let's leave it like it is.
> 
> Maybe future generations will wonder what it is named after
> similarly to GCOS field in passwd today :-)

For that matter, do we still need xten, a user who has been pushed so far
to the edge of obscurity that it's home directory doesn't even exist on a
freshly installed system (and I'm not talking about /nonexistent).

Ceri
-- 
Zoom!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021105220926.GB6129>