From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 18 15:07:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDC916A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 15:07:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F7543D3F for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 15:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA1A65339; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 85508-04; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561A365218; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:25 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3B75D61AA; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:24 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Robert Millan Message-ID: <20040718150723.GC87575@empiric.dek.spc.org> References: <20040716220848.A35405@armor.freesurf.fr> <20040718031554.GF1070@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040718133330.GA21009@khazad.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040718133330.GA21009@khazad.dyndns.org> cc: Nicolas Souch cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 15:07:28 -0000 On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:33:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > What in the world is this patch (ie, /dev/full) for?? > > I just don't see the point in /dev/full. Could you please give some good > > examples of its use? > > I think it's useful for compatibility. Whilst I'm grateful that you've taken time to submit a patch, you still haven't really explained which applications require this device to exist and be supported. > > Also what "Un*x OSes" besides Linux has this? > > Asides Linux, I only know of the Hurd providing it. But there might be > other kernels. It seems to me, though, that it might be better as part of the Linux emulation code eventually, as hardly anything seems to require it. Regards, BMS