From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 7 09:23:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA07597 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 09:23:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (cedb.dpcsys.com [206.16.184.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA07574 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 09:23:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dpcsys.com) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id QAA12518; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 16:23:11 GMT Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Busarow To: Burton Sampley cc: Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can SCO & FreeBSD coexist? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Burton Sampley wrote: > I've been trying to get SCO Unixware 2.1.2 (the free version) and FBSD to > coexist on the same system. So far they don't seem to like each other. I've had UnixWare and FreeBSD running on the same system (no MS though). When you allocate file system space for UnixWare leave a few meg free. Don't know why it works but it does for me. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82