From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 13  8:54: 6 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A415016
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 11FJcq-000Lv9-00; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:52:12 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Jamie Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: libcompat proposition 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:16:09 -0400."
             <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908130914100.26872-100000@dragon.ham.muohio.edu> 
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:52:11 +0200
Message-ID: <84266.934559531@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:16:09 -0400, Jamie Howard wrote:

> I saw someone say that anything NetBSD did in the name of portability must
> be right (in the test thread).  :)

Close, but what I said was more along the lines that following NetBSD's
footsteps on issues relating to portability is _seldom_ a bad idea.

:-)

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message