Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:40 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus Message-ID: <20111213144539.GB1587@mole.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <201112131406.pBDE61bc053693@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201112131406.pBDE61bc053693@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:06:01PM +0000, Ed Schouten wrote: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011 > New Revision: 228471 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471 > > Log: > Replace `inline static' by `static inline'. > > If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be > placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace __inline by > inline in the files affected. No, declaration-specifier is defined recursively - any order is allowed. Still I think having a consistent order is a good idea. Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111213144539.GB1587>