From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 14:45:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D391065676; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from fep19.mx.upcmail.net (fep19.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30068FC08; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.04 201-2260-151-105-20111014) with ESMTP id <20111213144541.PUSJ9634.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:41 +0100 Received: from mole.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id 8elg1i0230a5KZh03elghi; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:41 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.47.85.26 Received: by mole.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BEE516D432; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:40 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20111213144539.GB1587@mole.fafoe.narf.at> References: <201112131406.pBDE61bc053693@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201112131406.pBDE61bc053693@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228471 - in head/sys: boot/arm/at91/libat91 dev/cm dev/de dev/fdc dev/pccard dev/spibus dev/xen/netback pc98/cbus X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:45:43 -0000 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:06:01PM +0000, Ed Schouten wrote: > Author: ed > Date: Tue Dec 13 14:06:01 2011 > New Revision: 228471 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228471 > > Log: > Replace `inline static' by `static inline'. > > If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be > placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace __inline by > inline in the files affected. No, declaration-specifier is defined recursively - any order is allowed. Still I think having a consistent order is a good idea. Stefan