From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Tue Jul 9 19:35:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B616415E3895 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D94182722 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1F87515E3890; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB3515E388F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CACB82719 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C311B369 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x69JZGjA099761 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x69JZGER099760 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 19:35:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:35:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:35:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237068 --- Comment #46 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #45) Okay. Note that beyond eliminating such from what -lc++ pulled in (coment #32 that I fogot to mention), I had to eliminate such from ports (comment #38 that I mentioned): For sure: devel/libedit textproc/libxml2 converters/libiconv Possibly: math/gmp math/mpfr math/mpc I'm not aware of __bss_start in the .dynsym information being anywhere else impacting my tests. I've not seen the problem again in any context after rebuilding everything (system and ports) to not have __bss_start in the .dynsym information. But I did have to rebuild everything involved by using a toolchain that did not add __bss_start in the .dynsym information, including in poudriere so that the ports involved would avoid such as well. If there is another way for the problem to happen, isolating it may be easier from an environment that does not have any examples involved with __bss_start in the .dynsym information . Unfortunately I've no clue how to cause the problem in such a context. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=