From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 28 09:25:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A801065672 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cpanel03.rubas-s03.net (cpanel03.rubas-s03.net [195.182.222.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417F48FC1D for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 80-218-191-236.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.191.236] helo=gahrtop.localhost) by cpanel03.rubas-s03.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JUVmt-0006q9-Sp; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:34:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47C5F356.3000101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:33:42 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080208) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri References: <1204146470.47c5d1267ceee@webmail.rawbw.com> <47C5D8F6.20608@errno.com> <1204149622.47c5dd76995ba@webmail.rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <1204149622.47c5dd76995ba@webmail.rawbw.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=9571F78E; url=http://gahr.ch/pgp/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel03.rubas-s03.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - FreeBSD.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it possible that modern wireless card only supports WPA and not WEP or this is a bug in the driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:25:06 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Yuri wrote: > Isn't it better to have 2 separate flags in CAPS: for example WEP and WEPHW? > WEP would mean that WEP is supported and WEPHW would mean that it's supported > through hardware. It wouldn't make sense. Flags are used to specify capabilities of the interface, not things provided by the operating system. > > Yuri - -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEAREKAAYFAkfF81YACgkQwMJqmJVx946NRQCggHH4abFDjkRObQst1QgXm2Wb UlAAn2Y9B4u9v1o2FYg38txv8VlYjysF =10Nx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----