Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:15:24 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Why ports are allowed to be linked with base OpenSSL? Message-ID: <de742cb7-34e5-97d2-b12b-eb764682327e@rawbw.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=base. I know this has been discussed here before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with SSL_DEFAULT=base, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=openssl, this will obviously cause conflicts when two incompatible openssl libraries will be mapped into the same process. Isn't it better to only allow port OpenSSL for ports, and disallow base OpenSSL in ports, so that there will be homogeneity of openssl? Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?de742cb7-34e5-97d2-b12b-eb764682327e>