From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 14:48:23 2011
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E6E106566B
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 14:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5958FC15
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2011 14:48:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [128.206.184.213] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	pB5EmDOh079185; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:48:14 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <4EDCD9AD.1000504@missouri.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:48:13 -0600
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20111120 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
References: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>
In-Reply-To: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Move ctm to ports?
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:48:23 -0000

On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Roman Kurakin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base
>>> system, and making it into a port?

OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports.  I'll see if I can get a 
src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff.

Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM.  Do any of 
you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon 
something in the ports - namely subversion and xz?  (And hopefully in 
the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)