Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:48:13 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Move ctm to ports? Message-ID: <4EDCD9AD.1000504@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201112051426.pB5EQnOH038029@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/05/11 08:26, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Roman Kurakin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >>> How would people feel about removing ctm and mkctm from the base >>> system, and making it into a port? OK, I am persuaded - no moving CTM to ports. I'll see if I can get a src commit bit, with the promise that I will only touch the ctm stuff. Next - suppose I want to make svn-cur officially part of CTM. Do any of you see a problem with having something in the base depending upon something in the ports - namely subversion and xz? (And hopefully in the next few years, subversion will become part of base.)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDCD9AD.1000504>