From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 02:01:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D083D4 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from mail.distal.com (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747E8607 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magrathea.distal.com (magrathea.distal.com [206.138.151.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.distal.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1Q21G9l021553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:01:16 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.1-STABLE on Netra X1 From: Chris Ross In-Reply-To: <20130226013400.GG955@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:01:16 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5F00D05B-37BB-4342-AE56-C707B5267C17@distal.com> References: <20130225101315.GA79064@alchemy.franken.de> <76C74932-5BB0-4194-86CE-F121F6D18D84@distal.com> <20130225214941.GD955@alchemy.franken.de> <3A37672E-B6F7-4D5E-8293-0ED3B203C358@distal.com> <20130226013400.GG955@alchemy.franken.de> To: Marius Strobl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.distal.com [206.138.151.250]); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:01:16 -0500 (EST) Cc: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:01:21 -0000 On Feb 25, 2013, at 20:34 , Marius Strobl = wrote: >> It's clearly low-end hardware, and I could believe that it may be a = "affects >> some but not all systems". But, assuming it's more than just _one_ = bogus >> system, finding a way to deal with it at HEAD makes sense. Not = necessarily >> that the earlier code is the only or best solution. >=20 > Will do, I have to think about this some more though. That's fine. No problem. I completely understand, and am working on = my own for my immediate needs. But, on this thread, if there is anyone else on the freebsd-sparc64 = list who has, or is running, a Netra X1, please speak up. More data would be very = helpful for this issue. Thanks.... - Chris