From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 14 17:34:38 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475E106564A;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net)
Received: from vniz.net (vniz.net [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC28B8FC0C;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vniz.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBEHYaPU041992;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:36 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by localhost (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pBEHYZP4041991;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:34:35 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20111214173435.GA41893@vniz.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>,
	Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>,
	Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com>
	<4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<4EE69C5A.3090005@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111213104048.40f3e3de@nonamehost.>
	<20111213090051.GA3339@vniz.net>
	<CAJ-Vmo=y44c2Lek058Rc=thVb+gzu2fm7i0vMHipiGGHC086Yw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=y44c2Lek058Rc=thVb+gzu2fm7i0vMHipiGGHC086Yw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:34:38 -0000

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:22:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 01:00, Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> >> If the algorithm ULE does not contain problems - it means the problem
> >> has Core2Duo, or in a piece of code that uses the ULE scheduler.
> >
> > I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine (Pentium
> > 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in the middle by ~1
> > second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all slowness is gone.
> 
> Are you able to provide KTR traces of the scheduler results? Something
> that can be fed to schedgraph?

Sorry, this machine is not mine anymore. I try SCHED_ULE on Core 2 Duo 
instead and don't notice this effect, but it is overall pretty fast 
comparing to that Pentium 4.

-- 
http://ache.vniz.net/