From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jan 30 14:26:04 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA13216 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 14:26:04 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA13210 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 14:26:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA21969; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 14:24:36 -0800
To: nelson@seahunt.imat.com
cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: sup and SNAP 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Jan 95 09:36:49 PST."
             <199501301736.JAA00848@seahunt.imat.com> 
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 14:24:36 -0800
Message-ID: <21968.791504676@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If I run sup, will I actually be DOWNGRADING my source code to the 2.0
> (current) level?  I've read the sup man page and the sup.FAQ, and it's

No.  sup tracks -current, and unless you've invented time travel then
you can't get any more up-to-date than -current.. :-)

						Jordan