From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Jul 14 20:01:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA01818 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 20:01:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from www.video-collage.com (root@www.video-collage.com [206.15.171.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA01810 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 20:01:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@xxx.video-collage.com) Received: from xxx.video-collage.com (mi@xxx.video-collage.com [199.232.254.68]) by www.video-collage.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA06101 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mi@localhost) by xxx.video-collage.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id XAA05191 for chat@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:01:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199807150301.XAA05191@xxx.video-collage.com> Subject: Re: STOP THE BLOODY CROSS POSTING! In-Reply-To: <19980714215435.49428@futuresouth.com> from "Matthew D. Fuller" at "Jul 14, 98 09:54:35 pm" To: Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:01:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" IMHO, this should be handled by mailing list software. Make sure => no-one gets the same message ID twice is rather simple, since all => the data is available to the mailing list software. This should => also solve the problem of people CC-ing responses directly -- if => the address is already in CC or TO -- do not include it. = =No, I like it as is... That way, I get a copy in my inbox (the to/cc), =and another copy in the -folder, so I see the one to me, and =have the copy in my archives. Well, then you can modify your filing rules to file the message into both places. There is no need for the mail servers to rush two copies to you, is there? Please, CC me your response (if any) as I'm not subscribed to -char. Yours, -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message