Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2022 03:44:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 261434] [sysutils/fusefs-sshfs] updating a file's atime causes its mtime to change too
Message-ID:  <bug-261434-227-n1dIz4JDjR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-261434-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-261434-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261434

Ivan Rozhuk <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|Works As Intended           |---
             Status|Closed                      |New

--- Comment #16 from Ivan Rozhuk <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Alan Somers from comment #15)

> That's in the else statement.  Look above, at line 2855.

#ifdef HAVE_UTIMENSAT - "new code" block, added in 2012, before it 4 years =
work
only code that requires both times together.


> As I've said, you haven't performed a valid test, because you haven't use=
d -o strictatime .

This change nothing.

>> It looks like that mount option is required on Linux in order for it to =
actually update the atime.

atime changed, mtime - not.
I do not understand what do you expect to see playing with flags.



Do you test all fusefs consumers to ensure that updating only atime work
correctly?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261434-227-n1dIz4JDjR>