From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug 24 11:22:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA13124
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 11:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (hq.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA13062
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 24 Aug 1997 11:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.8.3/8.6.5) id AAA16239; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 00:07:31 +0600 (ESD)
From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>
Message-Id: <199708241807.AAA16239@hq.icb.chel.su>
Subject: Re: Floppies for FreeBSD
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 00:07:31 +0600 (ESD)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19970824184909.PH41183@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Aug 24, 97 06:49:09 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > 2. You need to use mount, not mount_mfs (which is for memory, not UFS,
> >    filesystems).  Yes, there probably should be a mount_ufs too just
> >    for orthogonality's sake but there isn't - I've complained about
> >    the issue already before, and to deaf ears.  mount = mount_ufs.  :-)
> 
> There should be no user-visible mount_foo executables at all. :-)
> Use -t foo if you need.
> 
> Normally, these programs would be candidates for /usr/libexec/, but
> they need to reside in the root filesystem, for obvious reasons.

May be something like /sbin/libexec ?

-SB