From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  7 23:09:59 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBC716A417;
	Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net (eastrmmtao103.cox.net [68.230.240.9])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B16D13C442;
	Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net
	(InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP
	id <20080207230957.MJTL1351.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>;
	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:09:57 -0500
Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218])
	by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id mn9T1Y0014iy4EG0000000; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:09:27 -0500
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:10:56 -0600
To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200802071738.20992.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
	<1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
	<200802071801.38477.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <op.t56f0ir79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <200802071801.38477.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux)
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org,
	Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu)
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:09:59 -0000

On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:01:36 -0600, Mikhail Teterin  
<mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> wrote:

> четвер 07 лютий 2008 05:42 по, Pav Lucistnik Ви написали:
>> > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the
>> > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need
>> > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump?
>>
>> Where are the patches?
>
> Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in  
> fact,
> contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that
> aside, let's continue...
>
> The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches
> (implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw.
> Pointing it out should be sufficient.

What about the users that who are using ports, not packages? The  
PORTREVISION is need or/and add info in /usr/ports/UPDATING about  
reinstall these ports that depend on icu.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Best,
>
>  -mi


-- 
mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome@FreeBSD.org
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  multimedia@FreeBSD.org