From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 24 01:35:24 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ADF20A;
 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:35:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6342B21A6;
 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:35:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (etroy.elischer.org [121.45.226.51])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r7O1ZH8h003086
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <52180DD0.3080308@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:35:12 +0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: GCC withdraw
References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com>
 <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org>
 <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu>
 <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg> <21414.1377258940@critter.freebsd.dk>
 <5217A7D8.1030806@freebsd.org>
 <1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:35:24 -0000

On 8/24/13 3:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes:
>>>
>>>>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base;
>>>>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports;
>>>> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with
>>>> gcc in ports, that is.
>>> +1
>>>
>> well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running
>> kernel on my VPS (xen)
>> I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I
>> had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel.
>>
>>
> Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've
> seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2.
I don't know.. whatever RootBSD run, but the fact that I needed gcc 
for anything suggests that we should keep it around for a while.


> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>