From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 13 11:54:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321CFA426DD for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B0A18AC; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id tBDBshPw089661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 13 Dec 2015 03:54:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Subject: Re: Gogs port: A painless self-hosted Git service To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <566D38ED.7050406@rawbw.com> <566D5B3C.4040602@FreeBSD.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: <566D5C82.6040301@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 03:54:42 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566D5B3C.4040602@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:54:44 -0000 On 12/13/2015 03:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: > The big advantage of being able to use pull requests on Github is that > so many people who work on open source projects are already setup to use > Github. They've already jumped through all the hoops necessary for them > to be able to easily clone a repo, develop some changes and submit them > back to the original project. Having a low barrier to entry like that > is a really big deal. That's the thing: it looks just as github itself, only the host name in URL is different. Yuri