From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  8  6: 4:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C7BE37B406
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  8 Jun 2001 06:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg)
Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Jun 2001 13:03:04 -0000
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:03:04 +0300
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
To: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: free() and const warnings
Message-ID: <20010608160304.G7671@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
Mail-Followup-To: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20010608114957.C19938@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200106081055.GAA49069@lakes.dignus.com> <20010608154249.A7671@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <5ld78frunz.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <5ld78frunz.fsf@assaris.sics.se>; from assar@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:02:56PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> writes:
> > GCC complains when I try to initialize the structure with something like:
> > 
> > struct validation_fun	val_init[] = {
> > 	{"init",	valfun_init,	0}
> > };
> > 
> > This can be avoided by:
> > 
> > struct validation_fun	val_init[] = {
> > 	{(char *) (uintptr_t) "init",	valfun_init,	0}
> > };
> > 
> > ..but as a matter of fact, static, pre-initialized valfun structs are
> > the rule rather than the exception in this program, so having this
> > syntax for all of them seems.. well.. ugly :)
> 
> What version of gcc is this?  2.96?
> 
> All versions of 2.95.x that I've tried seems to eat the following
> program with:
> 
> gcc -O -g -Werror -Wcast-qual -c foo.c
> 
> /assar
> 
> struct validation_fun {
>     const char      *name;
>     void            *fun;
>     int             dyn;
> };
> 
> struct validation_fun   val_init[] = {
>         {"init",        0,    0}
> };

My explanation was a reply to a suggestion to remove the 'const' in
the structure definition.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If I had finished this sentence,

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message