From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Nov 19 16:30:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA17242 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:30:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-12.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA17237 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:30:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA01153; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:30:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:30:36 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711200030.QAA01153@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu CC: nate@mt.sri.com, rkw@dataplex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Annelise Anderson on Wed, 19 Nov 1997 14:23:01 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: Version Resolution? From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * It *should* come with the sources, as I said, so that the date is valid * no matter when the "make world" is done or when the kernel is built. Yes. Besides, the kernel build date is already part of "uname -a". * This seems to be the hard part. Well, how about just adding RELDATE for now (while you guys work on the "automated" solution, that is)? At least if that value is updated often enough, we will be able to distinguish between versions with "major" differences (some library added, "top" added, before or after 3.0-release, etc...). Satoshi