Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:12:34 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
To:        "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net>
Cc:        stb@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/22704: cyrus and cyrus-sasl both install pwcheck startup scripts, only cyrus-sasl installs pwcheck
Message-ID:  <20001109131234.A90684@hamlet.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <028301c04a7f$cff955a0$7d7885c0@genroco.com>; from hetzels@westbend.net on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:03:54PM -0600
References:  <200011082320.PAA10251@freefall.freebsd.org> <028301c04a7f$cff955a0$7d7885c0@genroco.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:03:54PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> You don't need to worry about customizations to the pwcheck.sh as there is
> nothing to configure in that script, its only purpose is to start the
> pwcheck daemon, no options are passed.

I disagree ... I often have changes to make such to scripts locally.

> You can always do a "chmod -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pwcheck.sh" so it doesn't
> execute on the next boot.

That's backwards.  We ought to have a guideline in the Porter's handbook
about this.  Actually, I believe that section 15.18 applies here.

> I have submitted a patch to the maintainer and PR 22465 (11/1) that removes
> cyrus.sh from mail/cyrus as it is no longer required by this port.  Could
> one of the commiters have a look at PR 22465 and commit it, as I haven't
> seen a response from stb@FreeBSD.ORG on this problem.

This is also backwards.  cyrus-sasl does not need to start pwcheck --
cyrus-imap does.
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001109131234.A90684>