From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 11 19:35:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA09142 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:35:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA09020 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 19:34:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (cs11i01.ppp.infoweb.or.jp [202.219.190.161]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA14523 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 18:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA13167; Sun, 12 Jul 1998 10:17:19 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from asami) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 10:17:19 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199807120117.KAA13167@bubble.didi.com> To: ady@warpnet.ro CC: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Adrian Penisoara on Sat, 11 Jul 1998 03:23:42 +0300 (EEST)) Subject: Re: Arrangements for new port of Pine 4.00 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Is the 'mail/pine3' : 'mail/pine4' scheme OK with you ? Please announce * me when you have finished the repository copy. * * Pine 3.96 -> mail/pine -> mail/pine3 * Pine 4.00 --------------> mail/pine4 Yes, that's ok. (Andrey, we usually err on the side of cautiosness when we upgrade major ports like this. We can always delete pine3 if pine4 proves to be stable enough.) I just did a repository copy. Please do the rest. Don't forgot to set NO_LATEST_LINK in pine4/Makefile. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message