From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb  2 12:09:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA08423
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA08417
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA08382; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 13:07:39 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199702022007.NAA08382@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: bisdn
To: grog@lemis.de
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 13:07:39 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199702021029.LAA10731@freebie.lemis.de> from "grog@lemis.de" at Feb 2, 97 11:29:48 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Oh really?  Do you get D channels?  What do you do with them?

Basic rate:	2B+D
US West:	2D+B

> > Think about what hardware the phone company provides for an ISDN
> > user over there, but doesn't provide for an ISDN user over here...
> 
> An NT1?  It doesn't do HDLC.

No, but it much more standardized for transport encapsulation than
what we have over here.

We have places using "ISDN" without NT1 at all.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.