From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Jan 22 15:50: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B6A14EE8
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:50:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA01105;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:50:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200001222350.PAA01105@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>
Subject: Re: kern/13644
Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/13644; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>, jasone@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG,
	lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kern/13644
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:12 -0500 (EST)

 I did not see  a single reply, so I'm replying  to myself. Shouldn't the
 PR be resurrected?
 
 	-mi
 
 mi once stated:
 =From mi Tue Dec 28 09:55:47 1999
 =Subject: Re: kern/13644
 =In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912281659210.9558-100000@alphplex.bde.org> from
 =	Bruce Evans at "Dec 28, 1999 05:03:47 pm"
 =To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
 =Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:55:47 -0500 (EST)
 =CC: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>, jasone@FreeBSD.ORG, 
 =	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, 
 =	lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
 =X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
 
 =FreeBSD:
 ==> => 	If timeout is a non-nil  pointer, it specifies a maximum
 ==> => 	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
 =
 =Solaris:
 ==> 	If timeout is not a NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum
 ==> 	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
 =
 =Linux:
 ==> 	timeout is an upper bound  on the amount of time elapsed
 ==> 	before select returns.
 =
 =Irix (http://reality.sgi.com/cgi-bin/getman/?select):
 =	If timeout is a non-zero pointer, it specifies a maximum
 =	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
 =
 =BSDI (http://www.bsdi.com/bsdi-man?proto=1.1&apropos=0&msection=2&query=select):
 =	If timeout is a non-NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum
 =	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
 =
 =Perl 5.004 (http://man.cs.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/man?OS=alpha&command=select):
 =	TIMEOUT is  the maximum  amount of  time to  wait before
 =	returning an empty list.
 =
 =It seems, all of the documentation (including the FreeBSD's) agrees. The
 =FreeBSD's implementation disagrees...
 =
 =	-mi
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message