From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 22:17:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862E16A4EB for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:17:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D32D43EAA for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (localhost.cs.earlham.edu [127.0.0.1]) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i62LpxOc077562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:51:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: (from skylar@localhost) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i62LpxB3077561; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:51:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: quark.cs.earlham.edu: skylar set sender to skylar@quark.cs.earlham.edu using -f Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:51:59 -0500 From: Skylar Thompson To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040702215159.GF76361@quark.cs.earlham.edu> References: <200407010219.44628.linimon@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407010219.44628.linimon@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Sender: "Skylar Thompson" X-Accept-Primary-Language: en X-Accept-Secondary-Language: es SMTP-Mailing-Host: quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-Uptime: 4:39PM up 14 days, 13:24, 12 users, load averages: 0.09, 0.06, 0.07 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2 (2003 Jun 1, compiled May 19 2004 13:14:50) X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does FreeBSD still support CPUs without math coprocessors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Skylar Thompson List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:17:56 -0000 --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:19:44AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > The FAQ claims that it does, but ISTR recent discussion about removing > the software emulation. However, a search of the mailing lists, and > Google, fails to show anything, so it is completely possible that my > memory is playing tricks on me. >=20 > If that support has gone by the wayside, I'll go ahead and change that > part of the FAQ, oth4erwise, I'll leave it alone. >=20 > (And yes, I just saw the 386 announcement, so I know about that.) NAFAIK. NetBSD still does, though. --=20 -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5dj/sc4yyULgN4YRAr/3AJ9MJacDJQtVVpdi/9g7IhCDL4nJkQCZAReb M8RpmbsUXp/0o44CoDXvrwI= =MVJq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Oiv9uiLrevHtW1RS--