From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 15 04:37:47 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA19814 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 04:37:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA19807 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 04:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA06992; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:37:06 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: growing X server processes In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 1995 07:18:56 EDT." <199512151218.MAA09375@exalt.x.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <6990.819031025@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I use it for everything. Without gnumalloc my server would easily > grow to ~10meg and never shrink. This was not very good on my 8meg ram/ > 32meg swap machine to have a third of my swap consumed by unused server You should try out the malloc in -current then. I would probably do even better than gnumalloc in low-ram environments. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.