Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:50:25 -0700
From:      "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net>
To:        Nerius Landys <nlandys@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Apple & FreeBSD relationship
Message-ID:  <6F1715DF-D31C-4610-872D-7A5E8457B8EF@shire.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinqpOeSro5dPJJ-yRa%2BZMDD0Nphu%2B4wd9Raxex7@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinqpOeSro5dPJJ-yRa%2BZMDD0Nphu%2B4wd9Raxex7@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Nerius Landys wrote:

> This is not a technical question.
>=20
> Basically I have some cash sitting around.  I'm thinking of investing
> part of it with a company that I believe in.  Apple came to mind.  You
> could say that I'd like to judge Apple's moral character before
> investing money with them.  Does anyone know how Apple reciprocates to
> FreeBSD?  After all a lot of MacOSX is borrowed from FreeBSD.  I am
> not seeing Apple's name on this page:
> http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml .  Are there
> other ways in which Apple might be reciprocating?


There are some/a few/several people working at Apple that play or used =
to play a large role in FreeBSD.  So they were basically paying these =
people's salaries for their day job which allowed them to be active in =
FreeBSD.  Also, there is some code put-back I believe.

Most of what Apple used from FreeBSD was the userland and the kernel =
interface so that the Darwin kernel could be used with FreeBSD userland =
utilities that affect the kernel etc.    Mac OS X uses a totally =
different underlying kernel and architecture but made a FreeBSD like =
kernel interface in order to be able to use certain sets of FreeBSD =
stuff.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6F1715DF-D31C-4610-872D-7A5E8457B8EF>