From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 14 13:50: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12DA150C4 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA61220; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199910142050.NAA61220@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports/14323: [PATCH] ports/security/pgp5: Invoked with unknown symlink Reply-To: Kris Kennaway Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/14323; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: ls Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/14323: [PATCH] ports/security/pgp5: Invoked with unknown symlink Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:45:11 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, ls wrote: > $ test -d /var/db/pkg/pgp-5.0i || { > cd /usr/ports/security/pgp5 && make install > } > $ pgp5 > Cannot open configuration file /home/ls/.pgp/pgp.cfg > Invoked with unknown symlink Umm, isn't this by design? You're supposed to use pgp[kve...] to invoke it depending on which functionality you want. Kris ---- XOR for AES -- join the campaign! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message