From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 6 17:27:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA15964 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 17:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obiwan.psinet.net.au (obiwan.psinet.net.au [203.19.28.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15959 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 17:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by obiwan.psinet.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA03017; Wed, 7 May 1997 08:07:59 +0800 (WST) Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 08:07:59 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: Ruslan Shevchenko cc: Jason Thorpe , Darren Reed , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Antispam sendmail.cf modifications.. In-Reply-To: <336DE9F8.1527@cki.ipri.kiev.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Dunno...I'm skeptical of GUIs for system configuration. Just seems > > that there's no way they could ever be flexible enough to handle everyting. > Thay must be extensability. > > > > In principle, GUI tools is not such bad, it can be usefull. GUI tools are good for most things, except for very low-level stuff or doing evil tweaky things to configurations. :) However, I like GUIs because it makes the *end user* feel more comfortable configuring something. Sysadmins and clued people of a similar nature are the edit-config-file-type, however I thought FreeBSD was also aimed at the average joe running Windows :) Adrian