From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 28 06:14:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA19510 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 06:14:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ache.relcom.ru (ache@ache.relcom.ru [193.125.20.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA19500; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 06:14:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@ache.relcom.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by ache.relcom.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA00404; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:13:28 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Message-ID: <19980328171328.26485@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 17:13:28 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: gcc in -current still broken Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org, jdp@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, after short discussion answering that we use att/linux assembler generation now and not commited assembler patch I see no commit reactions to fix -current gcc. The questions remains: Do we need to return to old assembler generation model or moving to new one is intentional action? If we switch to new model, is assembler patch only thing that affected? I.e. other areas needs to be checked. If we return to old model, gcc itself must be fixed. Please not leave gcc broken in -current. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message