From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Mar 19 17:46:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from serio.al.rim.or.jp (serio.al.rim.or.jp [202.247.191.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CBD37B7AB; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 17:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kuriyama@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.rim.or.jp by serio.al.rim.or.jp (8.9.3/3.7W/HMX-12) id KAA15768; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:46:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from rhea.sky.rim.or.jp (pppa73.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.163.73]) by mail1.rim.or.jp (3.7W) id KAA13419; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:46:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.sky.rim.or.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhea.sky.rim.or.jp (8.9.3/3.7W/rhea-1.2) with ESMTP id KAA55735; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:46:11 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:46:11 +0900 Message-ID: <868zze4dng.wl@localhost.sky.rim.or.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: phantom@FreeBSD.org Cc: nik@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: doc/ tree tagging In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sat, 18 Mar 2000 12:00:27 +0300" <20000318120027.A9870@scorpion.crimea.ua> References: <20000318120027.A9870@scorpion.crimea.ua> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.16 (No Son Of Mine) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 8) (Bryce Canyon) (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Alexey Zelkin > I remember about attempt of resolving of this problem by creation > of new sgml entities, but it looks little junkly for me. We'll just > create more problems with tracking of documentation for all branches > in that way, IMHO. And add more junk to SGML sources :( But we don't have -doc folks to maintain two branches on doc tree. Merging effort is too costly for us. Doc tree commitments come from doc committers, src committers, PR submitters and so on. Who should maintain changes to HEAD by them? -- Jun Kuriyama / FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message