From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Mar 13 16:33:11 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA02817 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 16:33:11 -0800
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA02811 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 16:33:09 -0800
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA05023; Mon, 13 Mar 95 16:56:27 MST
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9503132356.AA05023@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: 950210-SNAP Problems ...
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 95 16:56:26 MST
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199503132128.WAA00643@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 13, 95 10:28:21 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > You can't have too many static strings in the kernel!
> 
> So perhaps it should be made an LKM? :--)

As in "there is no such thing as too many static strings in the kernel"

...or was that "too many static strings in the kernel would be bad".

8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.