Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:41:34 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Subject: Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates Message-ID: <20190413204134.GA30967@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAAWYfq0Y7_SXJM3rspXN1mRzyyzxYayE1Upb4xZQmv1rNdpB4Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.444.1904130714130.10594@mx.roble.com> <20190413175954.GA29960@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAAWYfq0Y7_SXJM3rspXN1mRzyyzxYayE1Upb4xZQmv1rNdpB4Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 08:49:43PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 8:01 PM Steve Kargl > > > > My patches have absolutely nothing to do with making > > 3.6 the default python version. > > > > I have added functions to libm that are included in > > two ISO standards. This causes a name conflict with > > sinpi() in python. My patches trivially rename > > python's sinpi() to avoid the conflict. For some reason > > beyond the comprehension of mortal man, python@freebsd > > refuses to add the patches to the port. > > they asked for these patches to be upstreamed, and I did it, so these > patches now are in not yet released upstream python 2 and python 3 > branches. > Backporting them to python@freebsd is totally trivial. > > What else can be done here? How about taking the patch in my previous email, apply to your tree (any port committer can take the patch), and actually commit it! This isn't rocket science. APPLY THE PATCH AND COMMIT! -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190413204134.GA30967>