From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 12 19:58:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EEB430 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCC21237 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (host86-161-162-125.range86-161.btcentralplus.com [86.161.162.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBCJw08R070810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:58:01 GMT (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <52AA154A.2000706@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:58:02 +0000 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to make machine multi-boot References: <52A88A3D.4050309@fjl.co.uk> <1386780219.1257.93.camel@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <1386780219.1257.93.camel@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:58:09 -0000 On 11/12/2013 16:43, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using GRUB2 since there was the thought that GRUB2 could boot > FreeBSD directly, but I ended up with a chainload. However, even > when using a sane bootloader, such as syslinux, I would use the > bootloader from Linux and if possible chainload FreeBSD and drop > Windows completely. I used Windows for testing hardware. MBR IMO is a > good choice, I at least use MBR. IOW, I don't know what can be used, > but I know that at least GRUB2 does the job, when used from a Linux > install and when manually editing grub.cfg and the HDDs use MBR. > > I guess I should drop the set default line too, I didn't spend much > work to write grub.cfg. > > The snipped menu entries are many Linux installs. Thanks Ralf. I was hoping someone would have the exact runes to get all the BSDs, Linux and Indiana to co-exist on one drive but on your suggestion, I'll start with GRUB and see how I get on unless anyone else can chip in. Regards, Frank.