From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 17:29:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A37106566C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08418FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so1156742eek.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ttqT1iLnGhk3r5MKGk86hQZMU8kzkZiy8A1UycQussM=; b=qdG6YzL8rbMLaXZEzru/KBq2JolpI57pYVQ7tY6H0iUcOlWyz5E8er8PFFi9CTySQK tNVjgI0B6wOXo28SyWv2tsDjbTVue7ZcNrzZ7bLQRfhz8q88hjJpD/PRv6q7SuZgzHRP Ar9Ptu+nQdeGYcwi4Ynck05iXBvhsEc0828RZCRVOHMjaeSzl3sasaUPzrPtMyECuItj Is9L6ZQEJV1klk07NWnbgzyG3tF4cjKh5+MsFWgzRhfQJ5j0w/6kEtVbmwKTQRgP/OGy c4Imx28ajzX0bKfXcVSHUxRV7m0Zjaa3gtJBFp6I5CZs8latTDW2DusWJzaPKNfkkPRr PzCA== Received: by 10.14.213.197 with SMTP id a45mr6856200eep.3.1348766958687; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuborg (AMarseille-652-1-309-181.w90-8.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.8.52.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm19357242eeo.3.2012.09.27.10.29.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:26:01 +0000 From: Olivier Duchateau To: Florent Peterschmitt Message-Id: <20120927192601.bd152b6308eae220e5949b54@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50648B1A.50406@gmail.com> References: <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com> <50648B1A.50406@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:29:26 -0000 On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:21:30 +0000 Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Le 26/09/2012 14:10, Olivier Duchateau a =E9crit : > > 2012/9/26 Florent Peterschmitt: > >> Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a =E9crit : > >> > >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000 > >>> Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of > >>>> xfce4-terminal ? > >>> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory c= alled > >> xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ? > >> > > What do you mean by =AB Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory > > called xfce =BB ? > > > > > > > Have something like /usr/ports/xfce/ ? There's meta-port calls, x11-wm/xfce4. But if you want to known where're Xf= ce applications, try: for file in `find /usr/ports -name 'Makefile' -type f`; do grep SITE_XFCE f= ile && echo `basename $file`; done www/midori is hosted by Xfce project, but it doesn't need Xfce related stuf= f to work. --=20 olivier