From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 10:41:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0195016A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C226F43FDF for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:41:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 64550 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Nov 2003 18:41:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:41:28 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20031118183254.GB49964@regency.nsu.ru> Message-ID: <20031118103822.C64472@root.org> References: <200311170008.hAH08SMA032168@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031118183254.GB49964@regency.nsu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Robert Watson cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/nologin nologin.8 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:41:30 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:40:18PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, David Schultz wrote: > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > sbin/nologin nologin.8 > > > > Log: > > > > Document nologin(8) as being insecure in conjunction with a dynamic > > > > root and suggest alternatives. > > > > > > Should we simply be making nologin(8) an except to the dynamic link > > > defaults? > > > > It's presently a shell script, so that isn't possible. However, > > it could be converted into a trivial C program as in OpenBSD, in > > which case it would be very small if statically linked. > > Hmm, is there anything that stops us from pulling oBSD's version? > > ./danfe The bikeshed is not over until the "late reply to an early message indicating the discussion should be started all over again" happens. Therefore, this bikeshed is over. Sorry, -Nate