From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 22 08:16:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB02B03C2E for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999E2924 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA14400; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:16:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1bFdKe-000J89-T0; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:16:20 +0300 Subject: Re: panic in g_vfs_strategy() To: kargl@uw.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org References: <20160621220417.GA33717@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <30eb3425-b6e8-6b08-ad6d-d8188b7f9ad7@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:15:27 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160621220417.GA33717@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:16:25 -0000 On 22/06/2016 01:04, Steve Kargl wrote: > After a forced umount of a msdos filesystem, I received > a panic. I have the kernel and vmcore. The first hundred > or so lines of core.txt.4 follow my .sig. > It seems that this problem might have the same root cause as this bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210316 so it could be worth while following up there. BTW, some mail user agents render signatures (and, by extension, anything that follows them) in a much less readable way than a regular message text. -- Andriy Gapon